Goepel v. Goepel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Goepel v. Goepel

534 S.W.3d 923

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 12, 2017·No. ED 104912·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James E. Goepel appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Sherri R, Goepel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James E. Goepel appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Sherri R, Goepel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).

Goepel v. Goepel, 534 S.W.3d 923 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

534 S.W.3d 923 (Goepel v. Goepel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.