Goell v. United States Life Insurance

269 A.D. 573, 55 N.Y.S.2d 732
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 573 (Goell v. United States Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goell v. United States Life Insurance, 269 A.D. 573, 55 N.Y.S.2d 732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On a previous appeal from a judgment in faVor of the defendant we stated that the plaintiff has the advantage of a presumption that the age stated in the policy is the true age ” until rebutted by evidence to the contrary. (265 App. Div. 735, 736.) We did not intend to hold that at the conclusión of the entire case the burden of proof rested on the defendant to establish that the policy did not cover the plaintiff’s disability on account of age. The rule in this respect is to the contrary (Lavine v. Indemnity Ins. Co., 260 N. Y. 399; Steinmann v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 257 App. Div. 656; Carles v. Travelers Ins. Co., 238 App. Div. 43) and requires reversal of the judgment in No. 15536.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 573, 55 N.Y.S.2d 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goell-v-united-states-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1945.