Goebler v. Selma Mercantile Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goebler v. Selma Mercantile Corp.

263 A.D. 1012, 33 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7883

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 1012 (Goebler v. Selma Mercantile Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goebler v. Selma Mercantile Corp., 263 A.D. 1012, 33 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her through the alleged negligence of defendants in leaving an automobile without a rear light parked upon a highway, contrary to statute, with which ear one in which the infant was a passenger collided; and by the infant’s father for loss of her services, medical and hospital expenses, and for personal property damage. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of those plaintiffs, upon which judgment was duly entered. Defendants thereupon moved for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence, which motion was denied. Defendants appeal from that portion of the judgment which was favorable to respondents and from the order denying their motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. Judgment, in so far as appealed from, and order denying motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her through the alleged negligence of defendants in leaving an automobile without a rear light parked upon a highway, contrary to statute, with which ear one in which the infant was a passenger collided; and by the infant’s father for loss of her services, medical and hospital expenses, and for personal property damage. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of those plaintiffs, upon which judgment was duly entered. Defendants thereupon moved for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence, which motion was denied. Defendants appeal from that portion of the judgment which was favorable to respondents and from the order denying their motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. Judgment, in so far as appealed from, and order denying motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 1012, 33 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goebler-v-selma-mercantile-corp-nyappdiv-1942.