Goebel v. Carter

Texas Commission of Appeals

Goebel v. Carter

77 S.W.2d 215

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedDecember 31, 1934

DocketNo. 1667—6143

StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.W.2d 215 (Goebel v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goebel v. Carter, 77 S.W.2d 215 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

SHARP, Commissioner.

Mrs. Eleanore Goebel, as relator, invokes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to secure a mandamus requiring Hon. R. M. Carter of- Grayson county, Tex., judge of the Fifteenth judicial district court of Texas, presiding in the Ninety-Fifth judicial district court of Dallas county, Tex., to set aside an order entered by him in cause No. 92157—E, Eleanore Goebel v. John F. Goebel, in the Ninety-Fifth district court of Dallas county, Tex., as of the 21st day of November, 1931.

A writ of mandamus is sought to compel the Honorable R. M. Carter, district judge, to set aside an order entered in the aforesaid cause. John F. Goebel is the defendant in the original suit and is vitally interested in the order or judgment entered in that cause. He has not been made a party respondent here. As his rights are affected, he is a necessary party respondent. For that reason, the petition must be dismissed. See State v. Court of Civil Appeals (Tex. Sup.) 75 S.W.(2d) 253.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHARP, Commissioner.

Mrs. Eleanore Goebel, as relator, invokes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to secure a mandamus requiring Hon. R. M. Carter of- Grayson county, Tex., judge of the Fifteenth judicial district court of Texas, presiding in the Ninety-Fifth judicial district court of Dallas county, Tex., to set aside an order entered by him in cause No. 92157—E, Eleanore Goebel v. John F. Goebel, in the Ninety-Fifth district court of Dallas county, Tex., as of the 21st day of November, 1931.

A writ of mandamus is sought to compel the Honorable R. M. Carter, district judge, to set aside an order entered in the aforesaid cause. John F. Goebel is the defendant in the original suit and is vitally interested in the order or judgment entered in that cause. He has not been made a party respondent here. As his rights are affected, he is a necessary party respondent. For that reason, the petition must be dismissed. See State v. Court of Civil Appeals (Tex. Sup.) 75 S.W.(2d) 253.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 S.W.2d 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goebel-v-carter-texcommnapp-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack