Godwin v. State

143 S.E. 909, 38 Ga. App. 343, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 210
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1928
Docket18953; 18954
StatusPublished

This text of 143 S.E. 909 (Godwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Godwin v. State, 143 S.E. 909, 38 Ga. App. 343, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 210 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

In each of these cases the motion for a new trial was dismissed by the judge, and the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions in each case is upon that judgment. In neither case, however, is such assignment of error argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error. In each case, therefore, the assignment of error is treated as abandoned.

Judgments affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 S.E. 909, 38 Ga. App. 343, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godwin-v-state-gactapp-1928.