Godwin v. State
This text of 133 S.E. 656 (Godwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Will Godwin was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. As conceded by his counsel, the evidence authorized his conviction. The special ground of the motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, in our opinion,, as ■ shown by the record, does not warrant a reversal of the judgment of the court overruling and denying the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 S.E. 656, 35 Ga. App. 487, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godwin-v-state-gactapp-1926.