Godwin v. State
744 So. 2d 1242, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15151, 1999 WL 1036511
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1999·No. No. 98-3539·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences on all grounds, including appellant’s double jeopardy claim. See Billiot v. State, 711 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). However, as we discussed in Billiot, this decision conflicts with Crawford v. State, 662 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accordingly, we certify conflict with Crawford.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Godwin v. State, 744 So. 2d 1242, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15151, 1999 WL 1036511 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
744 So. 2d 1242 (Godwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wingrove Est. Ass'n v. Paul Curtis Realty
744 So. 2d 1242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)