Godwin v. State

744 So. 2d 1242, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15151, 1999 WL 1036511
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 17, 1999
DocketNo. 98-3539
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 744 So. 2d 1242 (Godwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Godwin v. State, 744 So. 2d 1242, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15151, 1999 WL 1036511 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences on all grounds, including appellant’s double jeopardy claim. See Billiot v. State, 711 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). However, as we discussed in Billiot, this decision conflicts with Crawford v. State, 662 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accordingly, we certify conflict with Crawford.

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., MINER and ALLEN, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wingrove Est. Ass'n v. Paul Curtis Realty
744 So. 2d 1242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
744 So. 2d 1242, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15151, 1999 WL 1036511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godwin-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.