Godwin v. State
679 So. 2d 362, 1996 WL 515287
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 1996·No. 96-2351·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Tess L. GODWIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Tess L. Godwin, Lowell, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
*363 PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the summary denial of her 3.800 motion to correct sentence. Defendant asserts in the 3.800 motion that the trial court entered a departure sentence without providing written reasons. This sentencing error must be raised on direct appeal, and it is not cognizable in a post-conviction motion. See Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995).
AFFIRMED.
COBB, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Godwin v. State, 679 So. 2d 362, 1996 WL 515287 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
679 So. 2d 362 (Godwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Korndorffer v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
E.D. Louisiana, 2023
Burrell v. Phillips
E.D. Louisiana, 2021
Vandyke v. State
76 So. 3d 1077 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Proctor v. State
821 So. 2d 403 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Blitchington v. State
816 So. 2d 1215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Santaniello v. State
753 So. 2d 134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)