Godwin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Godwin v. State

488 So. 2d 589, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1046, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 1986·No. No. 86-767·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Godwin appeals the summary denial of his pro se “motion to issue amended uniform commitment document.” Godwin appears to be claiming that the trial court, when sentencing him on felony charges, did not allow credit for all time served. We remand this cause to the trial court with directions either to grant Godwin all the credit time to which he is entitled or to attach sufficient portions of the record to demonstrate that Godwin is not entitled to relief. If the trial court again denies the motion, Godwin must file a timely notice of appeal to obtain further review by this court.

RYDER, C.J., and LEHAN and SAND-ERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles Godwin appeals the summary denial of his pro se “motion to issue amended uniform commitment document.” Godwin appears to be claiming that the trial court, when sentencing him on felony charges, did not allow credit for all time served. We remand this cause to the trial court with directions either to grant Godwin all the credit time to which he is entitled or to attach sufficient portions of the record to demonstrate that Godwin is not entitled to relief. If the trial court again denies the motion, Godwin must file a timely notice of appeal to obtain further review by this court.

RYDER, C.J., and LEHAN and SAND-ERLIN, JJ., concur.

Godwin v. State, 488 So. 2d 589, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1046, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

488 So. 2d 589 (Godwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related