Godwin v. State

488 So. 2d 589, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1046, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 2, 1986
DocketNo. 86-767
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 488 So. 2d 589 (Godwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Godwin v. State, 488 So. 2d 589, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1046, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Godwin appeals the summary denial of his pro se “motion to issue amended uniform commitment document.” Godwin appears to be claiming that the trial court, when sentencing him on felony charges, did not allow credit for all time served. We remand this cause to the trial court with directions either to grant Godwin all the credit time to which he is entitled or to attach sufficient portions of the record to demonstrate that Godwin is not entitled to relief. If the trial court again denies the motion, Godwin must file a timely notice of appeal to obtain further review by this court.

RYDER, C.J., and LEHAN and SAND-ERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

George v. State
488 So. 2d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 So. 2d 589, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1046, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godwin-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.