Godwin v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Godwin v. State

111 So. 318, 21 Ala. App. 645, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 367

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 16, 1926

Docket1 Div. 692.

StatusPublished

This text of 111 So. 318 (Godwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Godwin v. State, 111 So. 318, 21 Ala. App. 645, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 367 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This was a proceeding in bastardy. Issue was made up, and submitted to the jury as the law required, and the jury returned a verdict, finding the issue in favor of the state. Proper judgment was thereupon entered, from which judgment the defendant appealed.

In cases of bastardy, upon appeal, it is necessary to assign errors. This the appellant has done, two in number, and the only questions to be considered are those presented by the assignment of error. These two questions have been considered, and we are of the opinion that neither of the rulings of the court thus complained of injuriously affected the substantial rights of defendant. ,

The judgment appealed from will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This was a proceeding in bastardy. Issue was made up, and submitted to the jury as the law required, and the jury returned a verdict, finding the issue in favor of the state. Proper judgment was thereupon entered, from which judgment the defendant appealed.

In cases of bastardy, upon appeal, it is necessary to assign errors. This the appellant has done, two in number, and the only questions to be considered are those presented by the assignment of error. These two questions have been considered, and we are of the opinion that neither of the rulings of the court thus complained of injuriously affected the substantial rights of defendant. ,

The judgment appealed from will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 So. 318, 21 Ala. App. 645, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godwin-v-state-alactapp-1926.