Godwin v. McKamey
This text of Godwin v. McKamey (Godwin v. McKamey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2022-3873 _____________________________
JOHN ALEX GODWIN,
Appellant,
v.
HEATHER MCKAMEY,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John L. Miller, Judge.
March 13, 2024
PER CURIAM.
Because the appellant has failed to meet his burden to demonstrate reversible error, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”).
AFFIRMED. LEWIS, RAY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
James L. Heath, Destin, for Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Godwin v. McKamey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godwin-v-mckamey-fladistctapp-2024.