Godwin v. Advance Metal Lithographing, Inc.

255 A.D. 791, 7 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5344
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Order directing defendant to serve a verified bill of particulars modified by adding thereto a provision that where exact dates, times and places are demanded the defendant may state this information approximately, and where details of specific acts of abuse and insolence, and exact words of insolence, offense [792]*792and threat and acts of insubordination are demanded, the defendant may state this information in a substantially accurate statement. As thus modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Defendant may serve a verified bill of particulars within ten days from the date of the order hereon, upon the failure of which it will be precluded. Order of preclusion reversed on the law, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. In view of the modification of the order requiring defendant to serve a verified bill of particulars herein, the order of preclusion falls. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Godwin v. Advance Metal Lithographing, Inc., 255 A.D. 791, 7 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5344 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 791 (Godwin v. Advance Metal Lithographing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayes v. Utica Mutual Insurance
24 A.D.2d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Burns v. Hayes
193 Misc. 491 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)