Godson Eruchalu v. U.S. Bank

Ninth Circuit

Godson Eruchalu v. U.S. Bank

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 29, 2014

Docket14-15102

StatusUnpublished

This text of Godson Eruchalu v. U.S. Bank (Godson Eruchalu v. U.S. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Godson Eruchalu v. U.S. Bank, (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 29 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GODSON ERUCHALU, No. 14-15102

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-01264-MMD- VCF v.

U.S. BANK; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 22, 2014**

Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Godson Eruchalu appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his

request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §

1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying

preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its

discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing

factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l,

686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI