God's Battalion of Prayer Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Hollander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

God's Battalion of Prayer Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Hollander

82 A.D.3d 1156, 919 N.Y.2d 380

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 82 A.D.3d 1156 (God's Battalion of Prayer Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Hollander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

God's Battalion of Prayer Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Hollander, 82 A.D.3d 1156, 919 N.Y.2d 380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

[1157]*1157The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the Supreme Court properly dismissed its complaint (see CPLR 3211 [a] [3], [5], [7]). Further, the Supreme Court providently denied both the first and second cross motions of the defendants Larry B. Hollander, Hollander & Strauss, LLB and Hollander & Strauss, as successor to Hollander, Strauss & Mastropietro, LLP, for an award of sanctions against the plaintiff and its counsel (see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]). Rivera, J.P, Angiolillo, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1157]*1157The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the Supreme Court properly dismissed its complaint (see CPLR 3211 [a] [3], [5], [7]). Further, the Supreme Court providently denied both the first and second cross motions of the defendants Larry B. Hollander, Hollander & Strauss, LLB and Hollander & Strauss, as successor to Hollander, Strauss & Mastropietro, LLP, for an award of sanctions against the plaintiff and its counsel (see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]). Rivera, J.P, Angiolillo, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.3d 1156, 919 N.Y.2d 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gods-battalion-of-prayer-pentecostal-church-inc-v-hollander-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack