Godoy v. Godoy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Godoy v. Godoy

47 A.D.2d 754, 365 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9042

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 754 (Godoy v. Godoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Godoy v. Godoy, 47 A.D.2d 754, 365 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 18, 1974, as granted plaintiff’s attorney a counsel fee of $1,000. Appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements. The respective attorneys for the parties to this action attended a pre-argument conference in this court before Mr. Justice Benjamin on January 28, 1975. At the conclusion of the conference the attorneys were directed to attend a second meeting, to be held on February 26, 1975. The attorneys for appellant failed to appear for such second conference. Accordingly, the appeal should be dismissed, pursuant to the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.28 [c]). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 18, 1974, as granted plaintiff’s attorney a counsel fee of $1,000. Appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements. The respective attorneys for the parties to this action attended a pre-argument conference in this court before Mr. Justice Benjamin on January 28, 1975. At the conclusion of the conference the attorneys were directed to attend a second meeting, to be held on February 26, 1975. The attorneys for appellant failed to appear for such second conference. Accordingly, the appeal should be dismissed, pursuant to the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.28 [c]). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 754, 365 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godoy-v-godoy-nyappdiv-1975.