Godofsky v. Hirsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Godofsky v. Hirsch

263 A.D. 970, 33 N.Y.S.2d 118

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 970 (Godofsky v. Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Godofsky v. Hirsch, 263 A.D. 970, 33 N.Y.S.2d 118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to cancel a chattel mortgage, and for other relief, plaintiff appeals (a) from an order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prose-cure the action diligently, (b) from an order to the same effect entered on reargument, and (c) from a judgment dismissing the complaint. Order dated November 19, 1941, and judgment entered thereon dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from order dated November 27, 1941, dismissed, without costs, as academic. No opinion. Present— Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to cancel a chattel mortgage, and for other relief, plaintiff appeals (a) from an order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prose-cure the action diligently, (b) from an order to the same effect entered on reargument, and (c) from a judgment dismissing the complaint. Order dated November 19, 1941, and judgment entered thereon dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from order dated November 27, 1941, dismissed, without costs, as academic. No opinion. Present— Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 970, 33 N.Y.S.2d 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godofsky-v-hirsch-nyappdiv-1942.