Godley v. Darnall, Sikes, Kolder, Frederick & Rainey

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Godley v. Darnall, Sikes, Kolder, Frederick & Rainey

899 So. 2d 657, 4 La.App. 3 Cir. 1486, 2005 La. App. LEXIS 636

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 23, 2005·No. No. 04-1486·Published

Opinions

1 THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Glod v. Baker, 04-1483 (La. App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of the appeal are assessed to appel[658]*658lants, BCM, L.L.C. and Nawlins Kajun Foods, L.L.C.

AFFIRMED.

PETERS, J., Dissents and Assigns Written Reasons.

AMY, J., Concurs for the Reasons Assigned in Glod v. Baker, 04-1483 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Glod v. Baker, 04-1483 (La. App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of the appeal are assessed to appel[658]*658lants, BCM, L.L.C. and Nawlins Kajun Foods, L.L.C.

AFFIRMED.

PETERS, J., Dissents and Assigns Written Reasons.

AMY, J., Concurs for the Reasons Assigned in Glod v. Baker, 04-1483 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642.

Godley v. Darnall, Sikes, Kolder, Frederick & Rainey, 899 So. 2d 657, 4 La.App. 3 Cir. 1486, 2005 La. App. LEXIS 636 (La. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

899 So. 2d 657 (Godley v. Darnall, Sikes, Kolder, Frederick & Rainey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related