Godley v. . Crandall Godley Company
135 N.E. 914, 233 N.Y. 553, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 964
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Godley v. . Crandall Godley Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 N.Y. 656 →
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and Crane, JJ. Dissenting: McLaughlin, J. Not voting: Andrews, J._
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Godley v. . Crandall Godley Company, 135 N.E. 914, 233 N.Y. 553, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 964 (N.Y. 1922).
135 N.E. 914 (Godley v. . Crandall Godley Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.