Godley v. . Crandall Godley Company
135 N.E. 914, 233 N.Y. 553, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 964
This text of 135 N.E. 914 (Godley v. . Crandall Godley Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Godley v. . Crandall Godley Company, 135 N.E. 914, 233 N.Y. 553, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 964 (N.Y. 1922).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and Crane, JJ. Dissenting: McLaughlin, J. Not voting: Andrews, J._
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 N.E. 914, 233 N.Y. 553, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godley-v-crandall-godley-company-ny-1922.