Godkin v. Pick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Godkin v. Pick

27 A.D.3d 1183, 811 N.Y.S.2d 601

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 A.D.3d 1183 (Godkin v. Pick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Godkin v. Pick, 27 A.D.3d 1183, 811 N.Y.S.2d 601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Wayne County (John B. Nesbitt, J.), entered December 29, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order denied respondent’s objections to the order of the Support Magistrate.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Family Court properly denied respondent’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s order, by which the Support Magistrate denied respondent’s motion to “correct” a prior order of a different Support Magistrate (initial Support Magistrate) awarding petitioner a judgment for child support arrears in the amount of $21,770 for a period of over five years. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the initial Support Magistrate properly fixed the amount of child support arrears (see Matter of Frowein v Murray, 298 AD2d 647, 648 [2002]; Miller v Miller, 117 AD2d 719, 720 [1986]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Martoche, Green and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Wayne County (John B. Nesbitt, J.), entered December 29, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order denied respondent’s objections to the order of the Support Magistrate.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Family Court properly denied respondent’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s order, by which the Support Magistrate denied respondent’s motion to “correct” a prior order of a different Support Magistrate (initial Support Magistrate) awarding petitioner a judgment for child support arrears in the amount of $21,770 for a period of over five years. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the initial Support Magistrate properly fixed the amount of child support arrears (see Matter of Frowein v Murray, 298 AD2d 647, 648 [2002]; Miller v Miller, 117 AD2d 719, 720 [1986]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Martoche, Green and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.3d 1183, 811 N.Y.S.2d 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godkin-v-pick-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack