Godfried v. State

223 N.E.2d 41, 18 N.Y.2d 896, 276 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 969
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 29, 1966
DocketClaim No. 38369
StatusPublished

This text of 223 N.E.2d 41 (Godfried v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Godfried v. State, 223 N.E.2d 41, 18 N.Y.2d 896, 276 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 969 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence considered by the Appellate Division was properly before that court, since no objection was made in the Court of Claims (cf. Court of Claims Act, § 16, subd. 1). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Ftjld, Van Voorhis, BtjRke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 N.E.2d 41, 18 N.Y.2d 896, 276 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godfried-v-state-ny-1966.