Godfrey v. State

163 S.E. 218, 44 Ga. App. 779, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 503
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 17, 1932
Docket21993
StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.E. 218 (Godfrey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Godfrey v. State, 163 S.E. 218, 44 Ga. App. 779, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 503 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court’s refusal to grant the motion for a new trial (containing the usual general grounds only) was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 S.E. 218, 44 Ga. App. 779, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godfrey-v-state-gactapp-1932.