Godfrey v. State
This text of 69 S.E. 1080 (Godfrey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The charge to the effect that the law presumes every homicide to be malicious until the contrary appears from circumstances of alleviations, excuse, or justification, and that -it is incumbent upon the prisoner to make out such circumstances to the satisfaction of the jury, unless they appear from the evidence adduced against him, was in accord with the decision in the ease of Mann v. State, 124 Ga. 760 (53 S. E. 324, 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 934).
2. The complaint that certain portions of the charge were without foundation in the evidence was not well taken.
■ 3. The evidence supported the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment ajfu'med.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 S.E. 1080, 135 Ga. 571, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godfrey-v-state-ga-1911.