Godfrey v. State
220 So. 3d 1273, 2017 WL 2704497
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Godfrey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 So. 3d 218 →
Opinion
The order authorizing involuntary medical treatment is affirmed as the requirements of section 916.107(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2016), were proved by competent, substantial evidence. We note that order is not moot despite the fact that the 90-day period of treatment mandated by the order has expired. See Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1992), and Hills v. State, 699 So.2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Godfrey v. State, 220 So. 3d 1273, 2017 WL 2704497 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).
220 So. 3d 1273 (Godfrey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Godwin v. State
593 So. 2d 211 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Hills v. State
699 So. 2d 735 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)