Godfrey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Godfrey v. State

506 So. 2d 1158, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8212

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 12, 1987

DocketNo. 85-1849

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 506 So. 2d 1158 (Godfrey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Godfrey v. State, 506 So. 2d 1158, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8212 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the trial court requiring restitution since it is apparent from the record that restitution was not contemplated by the plea agreement. See G.H. v. State, 414 So.2d 1135, 1137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); see also Pollock v. Bryson, 450 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (where plea agreement contemplated the restitution ordered, defendant is estopped from raising alleged illegality of the condition); Dent v. State, 432 So.2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the trial court requiring restitution since it is apparent from the record that restitution was not contemplated by the plea agreement. See G.H. v. State, 414 So.2d 1135, 1137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); see also Pollock v. Bryson, 450 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (where plea agreement contemplated the restitution ordered, defendant is estopped from raising alleged illegality of the condition); Dent v. State, 432 So.2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same).

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 So. 2d 1158, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godfrey-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack