Godfrey v. Russell
This text of 667 F. App'x 68 (Godfrey v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Allen Lee Godfrey, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Godfrey v. Russell, No. 7:14-cv-00476-NKM-RSB, 2015 WL 5657037 (W.D. Va. Sept. 24 & Oct. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 F. App'x 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godfrey-v-russell-ca4-2016.