Godfrey v. Russell

667 F. App'x 68
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2016·No. No. 15-7751·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Allen Lee Godfrey, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Godfrey v. Russell, No. 7:14-cv-00476-NKM-RSB, 2015 WL 5657037 (W.D. Va. Sept. 24 & Oct. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Godfrey v. Russell, 667 F. App'x 68 (4th Cir. 2016).

667 F. App'x 68 (Godfrey v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hailey v. Mullins
W.D. Virginia, 2020
Prater v. Linderman
W.D. Michigan, 2019