Godfrey v. Faulkner

Fourth Circuit

Godfrey v. Faulkner

678 F. App'x 144

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2017·No. No. 16-7503·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Allen Lee Godfrey, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion filed in his closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for a transcript at Government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Godfrey v. Faulkner, No. 7:13-cv-00454-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Allen Lee Godfrey, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion filed in his closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for a transcript at Government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Godfrey v. Faulkner, No. 7:13-cv-00454-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Godfrey v. Faulkner, 678 F. App'x 144 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

678 F. App'x 144 (Godfrey v. Faulkner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related