Godfrey v. Department of Transportation
This text of 356 F. App'x 386 (Godfrey v. Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
Respondent Department of Transportation (“DOT”) moves this court in its brief to vacate the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) with respect to the Board’s res judicata ruling and grant its unopposed motion under Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) to remand this case with instructions to permit the pro se Petitioner Euwan Y.A. Godfrey (“Ms. Godfrey”) to proceed with her retaliation and hostile work environment claims on the mertis. Counsel for DOT alleges they were unable to contact Ms. Godfrey to determine whether she would consent to their motion under Fed. Cir. R. 27(a)(5) as no telephone number is listed for her. Counsel for the Board, Jeffrey Gauger, represents that the Board takes no position on the motion to remand. DOT Br. at 1-2 n. 1,13-14.
This court agrees that vacatur and remand is appropriate.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) DOT’S unopposed motion to vacate and remand is granted.
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 F. App'x 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godfrey-v-department-of-transportation-cafc-2009.