Godfrey v. Davie County Authorities
This text of 109 F. App'x 588 (Godfrey v. Davie County Authorities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John and Patricia Godfrey and minor children F. G., J.K.K. G., and J.H.G. appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and habeas corpus petitions for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Godfrey v. Davie County, Nos. CA-03-1222-1, CA-03-1223-1, CA-03-1224-1, CA-03-1225-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Jan. 22 & entered Jan. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 F. App'x 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godfrey-v-davie-county-authorities-ca4-2004.