Godell v. Saif Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Godell v. Saif Corp.

653 P.2d 1317, 60 Or. App. 493, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4291

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedDecember 1, 1982

DocketNo. 80-05378, CA A23841

StatusPublished

This text of 653 P.2d 1317 (Godell v. Saif Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Godell v. Saif Corp., 653 P.2d 1317, 60 Or. App. 493, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4291 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) assessing the extent of his permanent partial disability for atopic eczema at 5 percent. He seeks reinstatement of the referee’s assessment of 40 percent. On de novo review, we assess the extent of claimant’s disability at 20 percent. See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103, 585 P2d 1149, rev den 284 Or 521 (1978).

The order of the Workers’ Compensation Board is modified to award claimant 64 degrees for 20 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Claimant appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) assessing the extent of his permanent partial disability for atopic eczema at 5 percent. He seeks reinstatement of the referee’s assessment of 40 percent. On de novo review, we assess the extent of claimant’s disability at 20 percent. See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103, 585 P2d 1149, rev den 284 Or 521 (1978).

The order of the Workers’ Compensation Board is modified to award claimant 64 degrees for 20 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

653 P.2d 1317, 60 Or. App. 493, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godell-v-saif-corp-orctapp-1982.