Godding v. Brackett
34 Me. 27
Opinion
orally. — The bill of sale was not essential to the transfer of the property, and it may be controlled by testimony. The instruction permitted the jury to find, and they must have found, that Hancock paid his own money, and purchased the property for himself. By such finding, it results that the plaintiff was not the purchaser in good faith, and that Hancock, though not the nominal, was the real purchaser.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Godding v. Brackett, 34 Me. 27 (Me. 1852).
34 Me. 27 (Godding v. Brackett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
French v. Newberry
82 N.W. 840 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1900)