Goddard's Estate

48 A. 404, 198 Pa. 454, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 819
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 25, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 327·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The report of the master and examiner approved and confirmed by the orphans’ court, together with the decree of said court corresponding with and sustaining the same, constitutes a sufficient answer to the appellant’s contention and renders extended discussion of the principal questions involved unnecessary. The argument of the appellant’s counsel having been duly considered, and failed to convince us of error, it is our plain duty to affirm the decree.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goddard's Estate, 48 A. 404, 198 Pa. 454, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 819 (Pa. 1901).

48 A. 404 (Goddard's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edwards Estate
180 A.2d 590 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Laucks Estate
57 A.2d 855 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Olmsted Estate
65 Pa. D. & C. 451 (Dauphin County Orphans' Court, 1947)
Quigley's Estate
198 A. 85 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Harris's Estate
16 Pa. D. & C. 639 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1932)
Van Syckel's Estate
9 Pa. D. & C. 485 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1927)
McCafferty's Estate
2 Pa. D. & C. 29 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1922)
Whitman's Estate
93 A. 1062 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)