Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Goddard v. State

Goddard v. State

633 So. 2d 1191, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2820, 1994 WL 94202
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 25, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1748
StatusPublished

This text of 633 So. 2d 1191 (Goddard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goddard v. State, 633 So. 2d 1191, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2820, 1994 WL 94202 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

HARRIS, Chief Judge.

We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence for trafficking in cocaine. However, our review of the record reveals that the defendant was never apprised of his right to contest the amount of the contract attorney’s lien that was imposed. See Smith v. State, 622 So.2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Therefore, the $600 lien is stricken without prejudice to its reimposition upon compliance with Rule 3.720(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opimon.

AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opimon.

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
622 So. 2d 638 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 So. 2d 1191, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2820, 1994 WL 94202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goddard-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.