Goddard v. Hill

33 Me. 582
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1851·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Held by the Court, that such testimony could not be admitted, as it would be at variance with the written contract.

The defendant then contended that it was his right to prove a partial failure of consideration and offered to do it. Held, by the Court, [583]*583that the giving up by the plaintiff of the note he hold against Kirby, was a sufficient consideration, even though it were of an amount less than the $1400, and the evidence was rejected.

Peters, for the plaintiff. Blake, for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goddard v. Hill, 33 Me. 582 (Me. 1851).

33 Me. 582 (Goddard v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Milan Bank v. Richmond
139 S.W. 352 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)