Goddard v. American Peroxide & Chemical Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goddard v. American Peroxide & Chemical Co.

126 A.D. 902, 110 N.Y.S. 1129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D. 902 (Goddard v. American Peroxide & Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goddard v. American Peroxide & Chemical Co., 126 A.D. 902, 110 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Without passing upon the question as to whether or not the defendant is guilty of unfair competition in business such as would justify an injunction, as that question should be left to the trial of the action, we think the order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

Without passing upon the question as to whether or not the defendant is guilty of unfair competition in business such as would justify an injunction, as that question should be left to the trial of the action, we think the order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D. 902, 110 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goddard-v-american-peroxide-chemical-co-nyappdiv-1908.