Godbey v. Mohn

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 356
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 14, 1960
DocketNo. 36481
StatusPublished

This text of 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 356 (Godbey v. Mohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Godbey v. Mohn, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 356 (Ohio 1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellants contend that the Court of Appeals erred in refusing to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the question before it was moot.

It appears from the record that, during the pendency of the case in the Court of Common Pleas, the city of Toledo, by ordinance No. 206-59, accepted the application for annexation and annexed the area to the city, and that, therefore, the case had become moot. The Court of Appeals was in error in overruling the motion to dismiss on that ground.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell and Herbert, JJ., concur. O’Neill, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/godbey-v-mohn-ohio-1960.