Goblet v. New York Power & Light Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goblet v. New York Power & Light Corp.

267 A.D. 1030, 48 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6090

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 A.D. 1030 (Goblet v. New York Power & Light Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goblet v. New York Power & Light Corp., 267 A.D. 1030, 48 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schoharie County (Wharton, J.), entered in the Schoharie County clerk’s office December 23, 1942, affirming a judgment of the Justice’s Court of the Town of Middleburg, entered upon the verdict of a jury dismissing plaintiff’s complaint in an action for trespass and awarding defendant judgment ¿gainst plaintiff in the sum of $57.24 upon its counterclaim. If plaintiff was indebted to defendant for the electric service sued for upon the latter’s counterclaim, no trespass was committed by defendant’s acts in discontinuing such service at plaintiff’s residence. Whether plaintiff was so indebted became a question of fact under the conflicting evidence presented at the trial. We think there was sufficient evidence to support the findings implicit in the jury’s verdict. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Schenck and Brewster, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schoharie County (Wharton, J.), entered in the Schoharie County clerk’s office December 23, 1942, affirming a judgment of the Justice’s Court of the Town of Middleburg, entered upon the verdict of a jury dismissing plaintiff’s complaint in an action for trespass and awarding defendant judgment ¿gainst plaintiff in the sum of $57.24 upon its counterclaim. If plaintiff was indebted to defendant for the electric service sued for upon the latter’s counterclaim, no trespass was committed by defendant’s acts in discontinuing such service at plaintiff’s residence. Whether plaintiff was so indebted became a question of fact under the conflicting evidence presented at the trial. We think there was sufficient evidence to support the findings implicit in the jury’s verdict. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Schenck and Brewster, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D. 1030, 48 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goblet-v-new-york-power-light-corp-nyappdiv-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack