Gober v. Chase Bank

269 F. App'x 492
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 2008
Docket07-60525
StatusUnpublished

This text of 269 F. App'x 492 (Gober v. Chase Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gober v. Chase Bank, 269 F. App'x 492 (5th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

*493 PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Howard Gober sued JPMorgan Chase Bank (“Chase Bank”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, seeking review of adverse decisions by the Mississippi Supreme Court and the Mississippi Court of Appeals. The district court dismissed Gober’s suit as barred by the Rooker/Feldman doctrine on January 29, 2007. See Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 268 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983). More than three months later, Gober filed a motion to reopen the time to file an appeal, claiming that he did not receive notice of the judgment until May 7, 2007. The district court denied the motion, and this appeal followed.

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6) permits a district court to reopen the time to file an appeal only if the court finds, among other things, “that the moving party did not receive notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 77(d) of the entry of the judgment or order sought to be appealed within 21 days after entry.” As the district court’s records reflect that notice of the judgment was timely mailed to Gober’s home address, the court did not abuse its discretion in finding that he failed to satisfy this requirement of Rule 4(a)(6). Accordingly, the district court’s order denying Gober’s motion to reopen the time to file an appeal is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
263 U.S. 413 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Banton v. Belt Line Railway Corp.
268 U.S. 413 (Supreme Court, 1925)
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
460 U.S. 462 (Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 F. App'x 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gober-v-chase-bank-ca5-2008.