Gober (Adam) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 16, 2020·No. 81695·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ADAM MONTRELL GOBER, No. 81695 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

FILE

CLARK, SEP 1 6 2020 Respondent,

ELIZABETH A. BROWN

and CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

THE STATE OF NEVADA, By S DEPUTY CLERK

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

In this original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, petitioner seeks a writ directing the district court to enforce its order requiring petitioner's former counsel to provide him with his case files.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 84.0, 844

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

6 20 - 3 (-I IN

KA 1947A ciSryz

(2004) (Petitioned I cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief i.s warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Picked. P , C.J.

Pickering

Hardesty Silver

cc: Adam Montrell Gober Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gober (Adam) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2020).

Gober (Adam) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Gober (Adam) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related