Goben v. Wells

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Goben v. Wells

1922 OK CR 29, 203 P. 1119, 20 Okla. Crim. 464, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 83

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 6, 1922

DocketNo. A-4194.

StatusPublished

This text of 1922 OK CR 29 (Goben v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goben v. Wells, 1922 OK CR 29, 203 P. 1119, 20 Okla. Crim. 464, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 83 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Now, on this 4th day of February, 1922, upon hearing of the application of C. W. Goben to require Hon. A. S. Wells, the regular presiding district judge of Comanche county, Okla., to certify his disqualification to sit as trial judge in criminal action No. 1445, pending in Comanche county, wherein the petitioner is charged with murder, and upon consideration of the petition and affidavits and oral testimony offered in support thereof, it is the opinion of this court that said judge should certify his disqualification to pro-. ceed further in said ease No. 1445, and it requests said presiding judge to so certify, and said judge being present, announces in open court that in accordance with the request of this court he will certify his disqualification, and ask that a judge be duly assigned in said above-mentioned case-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Now, on this 4th day of February, 1922, upon hearing of the application of C. W. Goben to require Hon. A. S. Wells, the regular presiding district judge of Comanche county, Okla., to certify his disqualification to sit as trial judge in criminal action No. 1445, pending in Comanche county, wherein the petitioner is charged with murder, and upon consideration of the petition and affidavits and oral testimony offered in support thereof, it is the opinion of this court that said judge should certify his disqualification to pro-. ceed further in said ease No. 1445, and it requests said presiding judge to so certify, and said judge being present, announces in open court that in accordance with the request of this court he will certify his disqualification, and ask that a judge be duly assigned in said above-mentioned case-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1922 OK CR 29, 203 P. 1119, 20 Okla. Crim. 464, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goben-v-wells-oklacrimapp-1922.