Goat Fashion Limited v. 1661, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 20, 2020
Docket1:19-cv-11045
StatusUnknown

This text of Goat Fashion Limited v. 1661, Inc. (Goat Fashion Limited v. 1661, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goat Fashion Limited v. 1661, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– x GOAT FASHION LIMITED, Civ. Action No. Plaintiff, 19-CV-11045-PAE -vs- STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY 1661, INC., AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– x PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: WHEREAS, the parties to this action (collectively, the “Parties” and each individually, a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connectionwith discovery in this action; and WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing thepretrial phase of this action; and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties to this action, their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, any other person in active concert or participation with any of the foregoing, and all other persons with actual notice of this Order, will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: 1. With respect to “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) that a person has designated as “Confidential” or “Confidential –Attorneys’Eyes Only”pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Confidential or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder. 2. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (each, a “Producing Party”) may designate as Confidential or Confidential –Attorneys’ Eyes Only only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: (a) previously non-disclosed financial information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, financial statements, tax returns, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, sales reports, and sale margins);

(b) previously non-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non-public company; (c) previously non-disclosed business plans, product-development information, marketing plans, marketing studies or other commercially sensitive non- public information; (d) previously non-disclosed identities of vendors, individual customers or other users of the Parties’ respective services; (e) any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or

(f) any other category of information given confidential status by this Court after the date of this Order. 3. With respect to the Confidential or Confidential –Attorneys’ Eyes Only portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as Confidential or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as Confidential or Confidential–Attorneys’Eyes Only the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility; and (b) producing for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the protected information redacted. 4. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential or Confidential –Attorneys’Eyes Only information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of

record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated Confidential or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only, in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that person’s counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential or Confidential –Attorneys’ Eyes Only. For section (b) of this paragraph, the following procedure will apply instead to depositions taken as part of expedited discovery for disposition of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff on March 23, 2020 (Dkt. Nos. 26-30): A

Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only Discovery Material by notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within three (3)days of receiving the transcript of the deposition, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated Confidential or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only, in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that person’s counsel. From the date of the deposition through the date the Producing Party notifies the reporter and all counsel of record regarding said confidentiality designations, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only. 5. If at any time before the trial of this action a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated as Confidential or Confidential –Attorneys’ Eyes Only some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously produced without limitation, the Producing Party may

so designate such material by notifying all Parties in writing. Thereafter, all persons subject to this Order will treat such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material as Confidential or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only. In addition, the Producing Party shall provide each other Party with replacement versions of such Discovery Material that bears the Confidential or Confidential –Attorneys’Eyes Only designation within two (2) businessdays of providing such notice. 6. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence.

7. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, other persons subject to this Order may disclose such information only to the following persons: (a) the Parties to this action, their insurers,and counsel to their insurers; (b) counsel of record for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, contracted support personnel, or other assistant that such counsel employs and assigns to this matter; (c) outside vendors or service providers (such as litigation support service providers, copy-service providers and document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this matter; (d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Goat Fashion Limited v. 1661, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goat-fashion-limited-v-1661-inc-nysd-2020.