Goad v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2011 Ohio 2739
CourtOhio Court of Claims
DecidedMarch 10, 2011
Docket2010-10556-AD
StatusPublished

This text of 2011 Ohio 2739 (Goad v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goad v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2011 Ohio 2739 (Ohio Super. Ct. 2011).

Opinion

[Cite as Goad v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2011-Ohio-2739.]

Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

RONNIE GOAD

Plaintiff

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION

Defendant

Case No. 2010-10556-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL

{¶ 1} On September 15, 2010, plaintiff filed this action against defendant, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (DRC), alleging his personal property was lost or stolen as a result of negligence on the part of DRC staff. On November 17, 2010, defendant filed an investigation report, stating on October 28, 2010, plaintiff signed a full and final release of the claim against defendant in consideration for $ 60.00. Thus defendant requests that the court dismiss plaintiff’s claim in its entirety. Plaintiff did not respond to defendant's investigation report. {¶ 2} The release in pertinent part states: {¶ 3} "The undersigned inmate does hereby release, hold harmless from any liability and forever discharge the State of Ohio and the Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, their offices, employees, and agents, personally or in any capacity, from any and all claims, actions, causes of action, demands, costs, expenses, and any and all other damages, which the undersigned inmate ever had, now has, or in the future may have, or claim to have, against the State of Ohio or the Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, their officers, employees, and agents for loss of or Case No. 2010-10556-AD -2- ENTRY

damage to property arising out of the following incident: Art Supplies-Reference Case NO. 2010-10556 AD.” {¶ 4} Upon review, the signing of the release by plaintiff constitutes the voluntary dismissal of his case against defendant. Accordingly, plaintiff's case is DISMISSED. The court shall absorb the court costs for this claim. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of the entry of dismissal and its date of entry upon the journal.

________________________________ DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk

Entry cc:

Ronnie Goad, #579-459 Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel 5900 B.I.S. Road Department of Rehabilitation Lancaster, Ohio 43130 and Correction 770 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43222 SJM/laa 3/7 Filed 3/10/11 Sent to S.C. reporter 5/27/11

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 Ohio 2739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goad-v-dept-of-rehab-corr-ohioctcl-2011.