Gnos v. Long Island Rail Road

190 Misc. 116, 76 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3601
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 16, 1947·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum Plaintiff’s attempt to board the train under the circumstances disclosed was, in law, a negligent act which contributed to the happening of the accident. (Cf. Solomon v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 103 N. Y. 437.)

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to defendant, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

MacCbate, Steinbrink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gnos v. Long Island Rail Road, 190 Misc. 116, 76 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

190 Misc. 116 (Gnos v. Long Island Rail Road) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Solomon v. Manhattan Railway Co.
9 N.E. 430 (New York Court of Appeals, 1886)