Gnos v. Long Island Rail Road
This text of 190 Misc. 116 (Gnos v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum Plaintiff’s attempt to board the train under the circumstances disclosed was, in law, a negligent act which contributed to the happening of the accident. (Cf. Solomon v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 103 N. Y. 437.)
The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to defendant, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.
MacCbate, Steinbrink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 Misc. 116, 76 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gnos-v-long-island-rail-road-nyappterm-1947.