Gnichtel v. Jewell
44 A. 1099, 59 N.J. Eq. 651, 14 Dickinson 651, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 158
This text of 44 A. 1099 (Gnichtel v. Jewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gnichtel v. Jewell, 44 A. 1099, 59 N.J. Eq. 651, 14 Dickinson 651, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 158 (N.J. 1899).
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison,. Ludlow, Collins, Hendrickson, Adams, Nixon — 8.
For reversal — Depue, Gummere, Bogert, Vredenburgh —4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lone Star Cement Corp. v. Palmer
18 A.2d 711 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)
Levy v. D'Alesandro
185 A. 543 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 A. 1099, 59 N.J. Eq. 651, 14 Dickinson 651, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gnichtel-v-jewell-nj-1899.