Gnichtel v. Jewell

44 A. 1099, 59 N.J. Eq. 651, 14 Dickinson 651, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 158
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 20, 1899·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison,. Ludlow, Collins, Hendrickson, Adams, Nixon — 8.

For reversal — Depue, Gummere, Bogert, Vredenburgh —4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gnichtel v. Jewell, 44 A. 1099, 59 N.J. Eq. 651, 14 Dickinson 651, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 158 (N.J. 1899).

44 A. 1099 (Gnichtel v. Jewell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lone Star Cement Corp. v. Palmer
18 A.2d 711 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)
Levy v. D'Alesandro
185 A. 543 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)