Gnecco v. Incorporated Village of Great Neck Plaza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gnecco v. Incorporated Village of Great Neck Plaza

263 A.D. 828, 31 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5172

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 828 (Gnecco v. Incorporated Village of Great Neck Plaza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gnecco v. Incorporated Village of Great Neck Plaza, 263 A.D. 828, 31 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a declaratory judgment and an injunction, order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss each of the four causes of action alleged in the complaint, pursuant to subdivision 5. of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that on their face none of them states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and to dismiss the fourth cause of action pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the further ground that it is a repetition of the first cause of action, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendants’ time to answer the complaint is extended until ten days after the entry of the order hereon. While the complaint is ineptly drawn, bearing in mind the liberality allowed in pleading in equity actions, we believe enough is alleged to require defendants to answer. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a declaratory judgment and an injunction, order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss each of the four causes of action alleged in the complaint, pursuant to subdivision 5. of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that on their face none of them states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and to dismiss the fourth cause of action pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the further ground that it is a repetition of the first cause of action, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendants’ time to answer the complaint is extended until ten days after the entry of the order hereon. While the complaint is ineptly drawn, bearing in mind the liberality allowed in pleading in equity actions, we believe enough is alleged to require defendants to answer. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 828, 31 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gnecco-v-incorporated-village-of-great-neck-plaza-nyappdiv-1941.