Gnapi v. American Farmers & Ranchers Mutual Insurance Company
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JEAN-FRANCOIS GNAPI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- ) Case No. CIV-21-1017-F ) AMERICAN FARMERS & ) RANCHERS MUTUAL ) INSURANCE CO., et al., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER The court is in receipt of the Joint Stipulation of Partial Dismissal with Prejudice (doc. no. 35), filed November 14, 2022, wherein the parties, pursuant to Rule 41(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff’s claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act (EPSLA). Upon review, the court construes the filing as a joint motion to amend the amended complaint under Rule 15(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., to dismiss the FLSA and EPSLA claims. See, Carskadon v. Diva Intern., Inc., No. 12-cv-01886-RM-KMT, 2013 WL 1876784, at *2 (D. Colo. May 3, 2013) (“[A] Plaintiff who wishes to dismiss some claims, but not others, should do so by amending the complaint pursuant to Rule 15.”); see also, Gobbo Farms & Orchards v. Poole Chem. Co., 81 F.3d 122, 123 (10th Cir. 1996) (“[Plaintiff] offers no authority, and we have found none, to support its contention that Rule 41(a) applies to dismissal of less than all claims in an action.”). So construed, the court finds that the joint motion to amend the amended complaint should be and is hereby GRANTED. Rather than require plaintiff to file a second amended complaint eliminating the FLSA and EPSLA claims, the court deems plaintiff's Amended Complaint amended to dismiss the FLSA and EPSLA claims. IT IS SO ORDERED this 16" day of November, 2022.
STEPHEN P. FRIOT . UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21-1017p006.docx
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gnapi v. American Farmers & Ranchers Mutual Insurance Company (Gnapi v. American Farmers & Ranchers Mutual Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.