GMO Gamecenter USA, Inc. v. Whinstone US, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 11, 2025·No. 1:22-cv-05974·Unknown

Opinion

Debevoise Debevoise & Plimpton LLP 66 Hudson Boulevard &Plimpton New York, NY 10001 +1212 909 6000

July 10, 2025 Via ECF The Honorable John P. Cronan U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Room 1320 New York, NY 10007 Re: © GMO Gamecenter USA, Inc. and GMO Internet Group, Inc. v. Whinstone US, Inc., No. 1:22-cv-5974 (S.D.N. Y.) Dear Judge Cronan: We write on behalf of Whinstone US, Inc. (““Whinstone”’) in accordance with Rule 4.B.11 of the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases to request permission to file a redacted copy of Whinstone’s Objection to Magistrate Judge Parker’s Discovery Order (the “Objection”) on the public docket. The Objection concerns documents protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine. Whinstone respectfully requests permission to redact the portions of the Objection that quote from and reference the protected information. Whinstone will email the Court an unredacted version of the Objection, along with the documents at issue, for in camera review. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Brandon Fetzer __ Brandon Fetzer bfetzer@debevoise.com

The request is granted. The Court finds this limited sealing warranted under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006). SO ORDERED Vhfe July 11, 2025 ee New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN > United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GMO Gamecenter USA, Inc. v. Whinstone US, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

GMO Gamecenter USA, Inc. v. Whinstone US, Inc. (GMO Gamecenter USA, Inc. v. Whinstone US, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)