GMAC v. Horne
This text of 394 F. App'x 13 (GMAC v. Horne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated appeals, the parties appeal from the district court’s order affirming in part and reversing in part the bankruptcy courts’ orders finding that a portion of GMAC’s claims in the underlying bankruptcy proceedings are unsecured. In light of our decision in In re Price, 562 F.3d 618 (4th Cir.2009) (holding debtor’s, negative equity in a trade-in vehicle included in amount financed created a purchase money obligation within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a) (2006), we summarily affirm the portion of the district court’s order at issue in No. 08-1850). Because the parties have settled the remaining issues by filing an amended plan in the bankruptcy court, we dismiss No. 08-1848 as moot. Accordingly, we deny GMAC’s motion to retain jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
394 F. App'x 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gmac-v-horne-ca4-2010.