Glynn v. 177 West 26th St. Realty Corp.

99 A.D.3d 579, 951 N.Y.2d 877

This text of 99 A.D.3d 579 (Glynn v. 177 West 26th St. Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glynn v. 177 West 26th St. Realty Corp., 99 A.D.3d 579, 951 N.Y.2d 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

[580]*580Defendant established its entitlement to an ejectment and to the dismissal of the breach of warranty of habitability claim through affidavits, leases, and notices terminating the tenancies. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to Unit 501.

The cause of action for restitution for the improvements plaintiff made to the units must be dismissed because the leases, which contain merger clauses, provide that any improvements to the units will become the landlord’s property (see Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. R.R. Co., 70 NY2d 382, 388 [1987]).

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint to add a cause of action for constructive trust must be denied because plaintiff failed to show that the parties’ business transaction gave rise to a confidential or fiduciary relationship between them (see Sharp v Kosmalski, 40 NY2d 119, 121 [1976]). Concur — Friedman, J.P, Moskowitz, Freedman, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sharp v. Kosmalski
351 N.E.2d 721 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road
516 N.E.2d 190 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 579, 951 N.Y.2d 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glynn-v-177-west-26th-st-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2012.