Glynn T. Murphy v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 30, 2017
Docket14-5788
StatusPublished

This text of Glynn T. Murphy v. State of Florida (Glynn T. Murphy v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glynn T. Murphy v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

GLYNN T. MURPHY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-5788

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 11, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County. James O. Shelfer, Judge.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his convictions and sentences for burglary of a

dwelling and grand theft. On the State’s proper concession of error, we reverse

solely as to the imposition of a discretionary fine and surcharge. The trial court

imposed “$1,522.50 court costs and fines.” This lump sum included the felony fine

pursuant to section 775.083, Florida Statutes, and the five percent surcharge pursuant to section 938.04. This fine and surcharge must be individually and

specifically pronounced at sentencing. Nix v. State, 84 So. 3d 424, 426 (Fla. 1st

DCA 2012). We vacate the fine and surcharge. On remand, the court may re-

impose the fine and surcharge after giving Appellant notice and following the

proper procedure.

We affirm in all other respects, and reject, as we have before, the argument

that a prison releasee reoffender sentence is unconstitutional if a jury did not make

the finding that the defendant was released within the previous three years. See

Williams v. State, 143 So. 3d 423, 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nix v. State
84 So. 3d 424 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Williams v. State
143 So. 3d 423 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Glynn T. Murphy v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glynn-t-murphy-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.