Glyn v. Owen

Circuit Court of North Carolina

Glyn v. Owen

1 N.C. 180

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina·Decided July 1, 1793·Published

Opinion

ERROR brought on a fine levied in the time of Queen Mary and at Mich. term last, ruled that the judgment he reversed nisi, and now, rule not having been shewn, judgment was entered as of that term, and on the nex day a certiorari was had to perfect the record. And the court did order that judgment should be entered as of this term, so that it might remain in pectore judicis to have it reversed or amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ERROR brought on a fine levied in the time of Queen Mary and at Mich. term last, ruled that the judgment he reversed nisi, and now, rule not having been shewn, judgment was entered as of that term, and on the nex day a certiorari was had to perfect the record. And the court did order that judgment should be entered as of this term, so that it might remain in pectore judicis to have it reversed or amended.

Glyn v. Owen, 1 N.C. 180 (circtnc 1793).

Pincite

1 N.C. 180 (Glyn v. Owen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.